Item 11: Agreement for Provision of Services in Connection with Proposed Owner Requested Annexation (La Cima Phase 4)

[COSM_Admin]

Consider approval of Resolution 2022-79R, approving an agreement for the provision of services in connection with the proposed owner requested annexation (La Cima Phase 4) in Case No. AN-22-09 of approximately 66.933 acres of land, generally located just south of the West Centerpoint Road and Central Park Loop Intersection; authorizing the City Manager, or her designee, to execute said agreement on behalf of the City; setting a date for a Public Hearing concerning the proposed annexation of said tract of land; and declaring an effective date.

 

[MBaker]

Given that this is part of a development agreement, is it possible to approve the SF4.5 but remove the occupancy restrictions that are coded into that zoning?

 

[COSM_Admin]

Response provided by Amanda Hernandez, Assistant Director of Planning:
Given that this is part of a development agreement, is it possible to approve the SF4.5 but remove the occupancy restrictions that are coded into that zoning?
This item is specifically to approve the service agreement and set the schedule for annexation. Is it possible to approve SF 4.5 but remove occupancy at the time of zoning – no, it is not possible to ‘condition’ zoning or remove / add standards to the district at the time of zoning. If council is to consider removing occupancy restrictions it would need to be considered as part of a development agreement amendment. Staff is currently processing an amendment to this development agreement which should be before the full Council in May or June – at that time this proposal could be considered.