Item 16: La Cima Development Agreement Amendment

Status
Not open for further replies.

COSM_Admin

Administrator
Staff member
Receive a Staff presentation and hold a Public Hearing to receive comments for or against Resolution 2021-232R, approving a fifth amended and restated Development Agreement with Lazy Oaks Ranch, LP and its partial assignees in connection with the La Cima Development near the intersection of Old Ranch Road 12 and Wonder World Drive that adds Film and Television Production Facilities as a permitted use and establishes associated development standards; authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the agreement on behalf of the City; and providing an effective date, and consider approval of Resolution 2021-232R.
 

MBaker

Council Member
Can we establish requirements for lighting in line with Bird City Texas Requirements?

Why would we not restrict the hours of operation allowed?

Were there any concerns from Police or Fire about the internal road sizes and responding to inevitable calls to this location?

What is the estimated Tax value for this use as compared to other community commercial options?

Could we require that buildings under this designation be required to meet certain sustainability thresholds such as materials longevity, energy/water conservation, tree relocation, etc.?
 

JHughson

CoSM Members
What happened to the sidewalk?

Where is the redline version of the agreement? There appears to be two documents, neither is redlined. There is yellow for text that appears to be added on both.
 

COSM_Admin

Administrator
Staff member
Responses provided by Amanda Hernandez, Assistant Director of Planning:

Can we establish requirements for lighting in line with Bird City Texas Requirements? The San Marcos Development Code is dark skies compliant, which is one of the Bird City Texas Criteria

Why would we not restrict the hours of operation allowed? Hours of operation are not typically restricted by the Development Code – the only Code restrictions are where a use is considered Limited and the proposal is to make this a by-right use

Were there any concerns from Police or Fire about the internal road sizes and responding to inevitable calls to this location? Not at this time. Fire Marshall’s office will also review the site plan for compliance before any construction is approved.

What is the estimated Tax value for this use as compared to other community commercial options? This is something we will have to look into – we will try to have an answer at tomorrow’s meeting

Could we require that buildings under this designation be required to meet certain sustainability thresholds such as materials longevity, energy/water conservation, tree relocation, etc.? City Council may propose amendments to what is presented. As currently presented, the buildings must be 80% brick, stone, stucco, concrete, or faux stone/brick and the development will have to comply with tree mitigation required by code. They are also subject to the newer water quality requirements.

What happened to the sidewalk? Sidewalks are required per Exhibit D. #3.H – they will have to build sidewalks or pay fee-in-lieu, which are the two options they have in the Code as well.

Where is the redline version of the agreement? There appears to be two documents, neither is redlined. There is yellow for text that appears to be added on both. Correct, since the ‘redlines’ were so minor staff presented the additions with highlighting as a way to draw attention.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top